The thing that bugs me is that it's very clear on screen, that Dolph wasn't given enough time, money, or good enough crew. The fact is there probably wasn't much of a stunt crew, there probably wasn't much involved in sets etc, and the very short shoot schedule is evident. I don't think this film has the repeat value of The Mechanik, or even The Defender- I was very excited first viewing but on second and onwards is where I usually pick apart the films more so. I still like MM, it does deliver a good standard DTV package and the finale packs a punch, but there seemed to be far too many shortcuts on it- mainly down to the producers.
Looking at the making of the Mechanik you see a total level higher. Bigger crew, more equipment, sets, a proper stunt team. Also of course, more interesting locales, far better cast and a longer shoot. Elsewhere the more experienced hands of the second unit directors, the DP and the AD's in the Mechanik, and Defender. It seemed that key roles where given to people without much experience in MM who got promoted to higher levels from previous gigs. It's also evident that the sound mix was not given the same time and effort as The Mechanik. There seemed a lot of typical stock sound effects really.
It's a little annoying because Dolph at times managed to pull of some great stuff- but the film just isn't as consistently on the mark as his previous two directing gigs, that's down to it being so restrictive and cheap. The location was obviously more expensive than Eastern Europe, but still at the lower end of the States in both price, and also interesting visual- the locations were extremely dull. Andrew Stevens is without doubt one of the worst producers to work with on a creative level. He's all about the money. Also super 16 just aint as good as 35.
Apart from that I liked it!
