

Moderator: Moderators
Nathan wrote:Not sure about this, firstly, I was under the impression Skin Trade was a rather gritty, brutal cop thriller dealing with human trafficking? Secondly, does Dolph know about Seagal's ego? It sounds like they'd both have equal roles but I can't imagine Seagal wanting to be directed by Dolph. I think Dolph should have got after Statham, (know he's very busy and Jox doesn't particularly like him I believe) or even one of the other Expendables before looking to Seagal. Does Dolph care that Seagal is a bit of a mess these days in terms of weight and his general look? I'm all for this movie, don't get me wrong, as long as Seagal puts his egotistic nature to one side, because I know Dolph doesn't have one.
Why not Michale Jai White instead...after all, Dolph said once that he would like to work with him...that would be awesome teaming up
Tom wrote:If he could get something out of Seagal like Rodriguez seems to have, then its a good idea. Seagal still has a big and really loyal fanbase. He can do no wrong in their eyes. Machete, Lawman and possibly the upcoming series he's doing, Southern Justice, could put him back on the map somewhat.
I probably would prefer Michael Jai White, Mark Dacascos, even one of the Expendables like Stone Cold, Randy, or Terry (no chance with Statham, he's probably got a little too much ego right now and would consider it too much of a drop). But here's the bottom line: What gets more buzz, more interest? Dolph and Dacascos or Dolph and Seagal? No contest. I guess Dolph thinks a team up of two iconic action guys, could really bring the money in. In part he might be looking longer term. A high grossing DVD to perhaps boost a budget for something a lot more personal to him.
It also might give financers proof he's a good enough director that they could fund a film he directs WITHOUT himself appearing on screen. If he can control Seagal, he can control anybody!
I'd also guess Seagal would have the secondary role and wouldn't be needed the whole shoot. If they use his time sensibly like Hyams did for D and JC in Unisol 3, then it could work. D would need to insist on things like Seagal doing his own ADR though.
I hope it happens. Okay, it could be a disaster, but at the same time, could be so cool!
He's also co-writing an action-adventure story about human trafficking, set in New York and Moscow. Lundgren says he would take a supporting role and try to find a bigger star to lead so he could land greater financing.
Jox wrote:He's also co-writing an action-adventure story about human trafficking, set in New York and Moscow. Lundgren says he would take a supporting role and try to find a bigger star to lead so he could land greater financing.
Nathan wrote:Jox wrote:He's also co-writing an action-adventure story about human trafficking, set in New York and Moscow. Lundgren says he would take a supporting role and try to find a bigger star to lead so he could land greater financing.
I'm actually glad to hear that, if Dolph took the villain role for example not only would it play on his strengths but also allow him to concentrate on his direction. He's looking at the bigger picture, I like that.
Tom wrote:
Me too. So perhaps Seagal leads the film, and Dolph plays the support. D always tends to shine when he's the co-star too. I think it'd be a good move, and take a little pressure off him trying to headline and direct a film at the same time.
Though if I was thinking more sensibly, as opposed to Seagal, they could cast a decent actor in the American lead. Maybe someone like Kilmer, or Cuba Gooding Jnr, who've both been linked with Dolph for Wanted Man and ST at some point. But having Seagal would be infinitely cooler.
IF Seagal is willing to work and deliver on set. But that is a big IF.
Jox wrote:Hanging out with Jason Statham for the TE probably helped him getting closer with Dolph so even though I don't really like him but Sly made it work for me and having him as the star would be a safe bet. Or maybe Dolph will get somebody else out of the blue?
Nathan wrote:Why don't you like The Stath anyway Jox?
Jox wrote:Nathan wrote:Why don't you like The Stath anyway Jox?
He always seemed to have an attitude and a show off to me which is something I can't stand and other than that he doesn't represent much for me in terms of a star even less an action star, he looks too much like the next guy or bully next door and I don't like post-2000 flicks like THE TRANSPORTER, B13 and all those craptastic Luc Besson productions, can't relate to them and maybe I'm just being immature but then I hate the fact that these movies were widely successful. Plus the I heard some stuff I can't here but confirmed my feelings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests