Page 28 of 31

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 06 Aug 2012, 19:12
by shooby
Poor Dominic !

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 23:53
by Mosquito
Jox wrote:According to this, ITNOTK2 has a $4,5 million budget (as opposed to 10 or 7,5 million like Boll said before) and made $6 million on DVD sales and TV broadcasts so far...


Which means that it's a success, no matter what the crowd says about the quality. Many big Hollywood productions fail to earn their money back.

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 13:37
by dolphage
Mosquito wrote:
Jox wrote:
shooby wrote:This problem is not du to his skiing accident he's got a few years ago ?

No that was nothing.

I don't see where people see anything wrong with his running in other movies, he's not graceful but that's it IMO...


Well I noticed it clearly in The Peacekeeper where I really had to laugh when I saw him running almost leaned back, pulling the knees very high. :mrgreen:

I am curious because it's something I noticed a long time ago, he has one of the strangest runs in all of movies. I've seen it in mot of his films, I remember Pentathlon and SILT standing out, but it's always been the same. He is "knock-kneed" (the opposite of bow legged) and he's also a tall and heavy guy.

It's just another reason to have him not run around too much... I like him being slow and deliberate, anyway. He shouldn't be running from things, he should be walking towards them. With a gun in his hands, and the intent of destroying them.

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 23:46
by Mosquito
dolphage wrote:He shouldn't be running from things, he should be walking towards them. With a gun in his hands, and the intent of destroying them.


Walking towards people - yes. But not with a gun in his hand but rather in preparation for a few cool Karate moves. The man doesn't need a weapon. The man IS a weapon.

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2012, 23:07
by Jox
Sigh... IN THE NAME OF THE KING 3... Not with Dolph! ...That was close haha!
Image
Hazen Kaine, an American contract killer living in Sofia, Bulgaria, gets more than he bargains for when he enters into a contract with the mob. One last job before he gets out and starts a new life for himself. The targets; the three children of royal billionaire Andon Dupont. Seems simple enough, or so he thought. Hazen apprehends the children and before he can blink an eye, a simple necklace worn by one of the children, send his life spireling back to medieval times. Hazen, now completely out of his element, fights for his life as he tries to escape a medieval army and a fierce fire breathing dragon.

It is here that Hazen learns what is it to be a real man and a true warrior. He must fight alongside these damsels and their people dodging arrows and fire balls, to reclaim a kingdom that was stolen from them years before.

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 01 Nov 2012, 17:00
by Nikolai Cherenco
:lol:
It Boll has made ​​a few respectable films. This is certainly not one of them. I look forward to the audio commentary.

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 05 Nov 2012, 02:03
by Jox
Would it have been better if Dolph had been in this one?
http://boll-worldsales.com/movies/10540 ... ailer.html

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 05 Nov 2012, 03:50
by savagesketch
I'm gonna say yes... Director aside, this looks slightly better. Dolph as a hitman swept back in time, or as a low-rent children's karate instructor thrown back in time?

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 06 Nov 2012, 19:53
by leigh1975
Another actor touted to be the 'next big thing' that has ended up in Uwe Boll films... what the hell happened to Domonic Purcell after Blade III and Prison Break? :?

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 09 Nov 2012, 23:55
by Jox
New stills
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 23 Feb 2013, 02:25
by Jox

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 27 Jul 2013, 13:53
by Jox
Full Japanese cover
Image

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 24 Mar 2014, 13:53
by bomaz
Finally bought my dvd (for 1,5€, wouldn't have spent more). ;)

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 03 Apr 2014, 11:28
by Jox
Strangely it's coming out only today and theatrically in South Korea:
http://movie.daum.net/moviedetail/movie ... mini=title

Image

Re: IN THE NAME OF THE KING: TWO WORLDS (Uwe Boll, 2011)

PostPosted: 03 Apr 2014, 19:34
by Jox
Boll:
Now, am I supposed to believe the title? Is this really the last mission? Or if they say, 'Hey, Uwe, we need a couple more of these...', are you going to jump on it?

Uwe Boll: Absolutely. We would absolutely do Part 4. If this is the second to the last mission, I don't care. (Laughs) I mean, its fun to make these movies, especially this time with Dominic Purcell. It was so much better than with Dolph Lundgren in the second part. He is not only a trooper, but he is a good friend, and he is physically really strong. So he can really run. Everything that Dolph Lundgren couldn't do in the second part. From this point of view, I would always try to get Dominic Purcell. Especially if we did a Part 4.

http://www.movieweb.com/news/in-the-nam ... -exclusive