Jox wrote:Remember that the film was completely re-cut (butchered) by the producers.
As for the so-called "shaky-cam" (I don't like this expression), whether we like it or not, it's a choice. For a long time hand-held camera was barely used in american cinema, but it's always been present and European films, it gives a different way to apprehend the storytelling and how we perceive time and atmosphere. On a production standpoint, a steadicam operator is very expensive and would only be used 2 or 3 days on a film like this, and the shots can also be time consuming to set up. With a 3 weeks schedule they couldn't have done it using a dolly either. I think it it's well shot here and works better than in CP, it fits this movie much better. I'm pretty sure it's less distracting when you watch it in the original cinemascope aspect ratio rather the 1.78 German release. I'm glad he's not doing it like Paul Greengrass (BOURNE SUPREMACY and ULTIMATUM, UNITED 93, GREEN ZONE) with 10 cameras and crazy-ass editing though.
"Shakycam", it's definetly a tricky thing to pull off. I actually think it works very well in the Bourne movies (the best spy-flicks ever IMHO), but when it doesn't work for me is when the directors shoots at too close of a range, a recent example being Quantum of Solace where you're either looking at Bond's back or his arm or just his face or suddenly his feet,

so unnecessary and stupid. While I prefer the longer and wider shots for action scenes, "shakycam" can be used to great effect, if the people behind it know what they're doing. I should add though, that I havent seen Icarus yet, just wanted to comment on the shakycam controversy.

Too bad about the producers butchering the film, hadn't heard about that. Not gonna stop me from seeing it, but still, it's just sad. However, you say there's a different aspect ratio in the German release? Does that include the other releases in Europe, and what's the deal with that exactly? I've never been good at understanding the whole aspect ratio thing ...