leigh1975 wrote:we didn't get that in the UK at all,
Yeah I don't think it was released elsewhere than America.
EDIT: just checked and it was released in Australia and Scandinavia...
Moderator: Moderators
leigh1975 wrote:we didn't get that in the UK at all,
leigh1975 wrote:Jox wrote:Lester is a business man above all and funded his company American World Pictures through which he produces and an distributes (i.e. sells the distribution rights worldwide), I don't think he cares much about directing these days. I also think his directorial successes, especially COMMANDO, were flukes and were mostly due to other people involved, not his input or skills as a director.
It has to be said, there is virtually no sense of style or flair in his directing... I'm not even sure he cared back then.
Travis wrote:leigh1975 wrote:Jox wrote:Lester is a business man above all and funded his company American World Pictures through which he produces and an distributes (i.e. sells the distribution rights worldwide), I don't think he cares much about directing these days. I also think his directorial successes, especially COMMANDO, were flukes and were mostly due to other people involved, not his input or skills as a director.
It has to be said, there is virtually no sense of style or flair in his directing... I'm not even sure he cared back then.
I have to disagree with this. The style of filmmaking is that it does not draw attention to itself. The editing and camera work are seemless and don't call attention to themselves. It just lets the action play out in front of the camera.
I miss that style of filmmaking. Now movies, especially in the action genre are too much about crazy camera work and editing and relying on that to spice things up.
I haven't seen an action film made in the past 10 years as good as Showdown or Commando.
leigh1975 wrote:Travis wrote:I'm not sure we've been watching the same films. Commando gets by with a good, witty script and Arnie at possibly his most charismatic period ever (the kind of presence that saves duds like Raw Deal), but the directing is flat and pretty hack. And, as for SILT, it's funny (sometimes intentionally, sometimes not) and one of Dolph's better looking films cinematography wise, but one thing I'm sure a few of even Dolph's biggest fans that know anything about the nuts and bolts of filmmaking knows, it's directed very lazily, the editing is technically efficient, yet the footage presented is weak (a sign that suggests that no matter how talented your crew is, if the director hasn't got the correct coverage then the film won't work), and the script is quite poor; it's clear that Brandon and Dolph improvised the funny dialogue. And the final proof in the pudding is that Warners knew it was badly constructed footage-wise, despertly re-edited it several times and it STILL didn't work, so they essentially sent it straight to video. One of the biggest reviews at the time call this 'spiritless'... I wouldn't go that far, but the only real life in the film is in the two leads. There's a reason why something like SILT doesn't work and flops, and something as equally fun but daft like Tango & Cash does and is a hit... it's better made. I love SILT, but I'm not blind to it's faults. Lester is it's biggest. I'm led more by hindsight than nostalgia.
savagesketch wrote:-- The goon who commits suicde in the police station, only to reappear later in the film.
leigh1975 wrote:Was the infamous "mall" car chase ever filmed , or was it dumped in pre-production?
Jox wrote:leigh1975 wrote:Was the infamous "mall" car chase ever filmed , or was it dumped in pre-production?
I think it must have been filmed but I'm still trying to get confirmation...
leigh1975 wrote:Awesome, constantly on Dolph duty, do you never sleep?![]()
Jox wrote:leigh1975 wrote:Awesome, constantly on Dolph duty, do you never sleep?![]()
Believe me I do!
Jox wrote:leigh1975 wrote:Awesome, constantly on Dolph duty, do you never sleep?![]()
Believe me I do!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests