Jox wrote:viendammage wrote:I've made peace with this franchise for being more of a gimmick than an actual series of films. With that mindset, I guess I'm just able to enjoy what they present.
And that's how I went, but sometimes there's only so much you can take. Then I'll give it another shot on French opening day this Wednesday, see how it feels two weeks later...
Moltisanti wrote:Neeson is still one of the most bankable names going.
Which is pretty ironic given how he's not any younger than the generation of Sly, Dolph & co, and comes from a more "serious" and respected career (even though he got noticed in THE DEAD POOL, THE BIG MAN, DARKMAN or NEXT OF KIN). It's the same with some French actors like François Cluzet who have become sort of "action"/"thriller" actors whereas they would have snubbed these kind of projects 20 years ago.
Neeson found the golden egg when he signed on for TAKEN. That film alone is what catapulted him into not just being a bankable action star, but a recognizable name again, period.
Regarding EX3, it was alright. Some great action sequences, eye-rolling dialogue, and characters who have no purpose to be in the film other than to show up, wink at the audience, and then leave. But after EX2, can't say I was expecting anything different. The recent episode of THE B-MOVIES PODCAST summed up the EX films pretty aptly... "They're not necessarily movies per say, but more or less nostalgic gimmicks whose purpose is to do just that... allow the audience to have fun relishing in their memories of 80's and 90's action flicks..."
With that being said, I do think with Sly directing the first EX, he had much more to prove, and as a result, much more was on the line. The first was much grittier with a more solid story. The later installments are much more jokey and self-referential, which some hate, others love. That's the gamble you take, I guess...